↓ Skip to main content

Guidelines for planning and conducting high-quality research and testing on animals

Overview of attention for article published in Laboratory Animal Research, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 102)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
63 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Guidelines for planning and conducting high-quality research and testing on animals
Published in
Laboratory Animal Research, July 2020
DOI 10.1186/s42826-020-00054-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adrian J. Smith

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Other 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 5 21%
Unknown 8 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 8%
Computer Science 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 5 21%
Unknown 10 42%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2021.
All research outputs
#691,875
of 18,890,258 outputs
Outputs from Laboratory Animal Research
#2
of 102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,318
of 297,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Laboratory Animal Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,890,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 102 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them