| Title |
Guidelines for planning and conducting high-quality research and testing on animals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Laboratory Animal Research, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s42826-020-00054-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adrian J. Smith |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 12 | 18% |
| Germany | 3 | 5% |
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| Belgium | 2 | 3% |
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 21% |
| Unknown | 24 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 44 | 67% |
| Scientists | 18 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 9% |
| Researcher | 6 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 18% |
| Unknown | 34 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 21% |
| Unknown | 39 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2024.
All research outputs
#918,145
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Laboratory Animal Research
#4
of 153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,935
of 433,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Laboratory Animal Research
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 153 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them