↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of different load intensity and time-under-tension calf loading protocols for Achilles tendinopathy (the LOADIT trial): protocol for a randomised pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in Pilot and Feasibility Studies, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy of different load intensity and time-under-tension calf loading protocols for Achilles tendinopathy (the LOADIT trial): protocol for a randomised pilot study
Published in
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, July 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40814-020-00639-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fatmah Hasani, Terry P. Haines, Shannon E. Munteanu, Bill Vicenzino, Peter Malliaras

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 91 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Professor 4 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 35 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 21 23%
Sports and Recreations 8 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 9%
Engineering 3 3%
Arts and Humanities 3 3%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 37 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2022.
All research outputs
#6,971,878
of 23,563,389 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#442
of 1,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,478
of 398,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#14
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,563,389 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,081 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,651 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.