↓ Skip to main content

Boys are more stunted than girls in Sub-Saharan Africa: a meta-analysis of 16 demographic and health surveys

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
4 policy sources
twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
416 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
704 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Boys are more stunted than girls in Sub-Saharan Africa: a meta-analysis of 16 demographic and health surveys
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, April 2007
DOI 10.1186/1471-2431-7-17
Pubmed ID
Authors

Henry Wamani, Anne Nordrehaug Åstrøm, Stefan Peterson, James K Tumwine, Thorkild Tylleskär

Abstract

Many studies in sub-Saharan Africa have occasionally reported a higher prevalence of stunting in male children compared to female children. This study examined whether there are systematic sex differences in stunting rates in children under-five years of age, and how the sex differences in stunting rates vary with household socio-economic status.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 704 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ghana 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 688 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 153 22%
Student > Bachelor 75 11%
Researcher 73 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 71 10%
Lecturer 49 7%
Other 119 17%
Unknown 164 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 160 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 104 15%
Social Sciences 69 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 42 6%
Other 78 11%
Unknown 190 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,984,085
of 25,649,244 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#241
of 3,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,433
of 90,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,649,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,491 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,327 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them