| Title |
Prone positioning under VV-ECMO in SARS-CoV-2-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-03162-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bruno Garcia, Nicolas Cousin, Claire Bourel, Mercé Jourdain, Julien Poissy, Thibault Duburcq |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 8% |
| France | 4 | 7% |
| Spain | 4 | 7% |
| Belgium | 2 | 3% |
| Italy | 2 | 3% |
| Ireland | 2 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 18 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 44 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 20% |
| Scientists | 2 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 119 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 16% |
| Researcher | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 25 | 21% |
| Unknown | 27 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 33 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,068,579
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#844
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,174
of 429,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#42
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,715 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.