↓ Skip to main content

How do multi-stage, multi-arm trials compare to the traditional two-arm parallel group design – a reanalysis of 4 trials

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How do multi-stage, multi-arm trials compare to the traditional two-arm parallel group design – a reanalysis of 4 trials
Published in
Trials, April 2009
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-10-21
Pubmed ID
Authors

FM-S Barthel, MKB Parmar, P Royston

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Vietnam 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 42 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 33%
Student > Master 8 18%
Professor 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 3 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 53%
Mathematics 6 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 3 7%