↓ Skip to main content

Home environment relationships with children’s physical activity, sedentary time, and screen time by socioeconomic status

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
277 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
554 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Home environment relationships with children’s physical activity, sedentary time, and screen time by socioeconomic status
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-9-88
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pooja S Tandon, Chuan Zhou, James F Sallis, Kelli L Cain, Lawrence D Frank, Brian E Saelens

Abstract

Children in households of lower socioeconomic status (SES) are more likely to be overweight/obese. We aimed to determine if home physical activity (PA) environments differed by SES and to explore home environment mediators of the relation of family SES to children's PA and sedentary behavior.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 554 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 538 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 101 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 97 18%
Student > Bachelor 85 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 46 8%
Researcher 43 8%
Other 88 16%
Unknown 94 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 77 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 72 13%
Psychology 68 12%
Social Sciences 60 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 58 10%
Other 89 16%
Unknown 130 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,961,507
of 21,993,335 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#771
of 1,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,970
of 144,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#5
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,993,335 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,881 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.