↓ Skip to main content

Home environment relationships with children’s physical activity, sedentary time, and screen time by socioeconomic status

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
15 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
264 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
543 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Home environment relationships with children’s physical activity, sedentary time, and screen time by socioeconomic status
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-9-88
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pooja S Tandon, Chuan Zhou, James F Sallis, Kelli L Cain, Lawrence D Frank, Brian E Saelens

Abstract

Children in households of lower socioeconomic status (SES) are more likely to be overweight/obese. We aimed to determine if home physical activity (PA) environments differed by SES and to explore home environment mediators of the relation of family SES to children's PA and sedentary behavior.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 543 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 527 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 100 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 95 17%
Student > Bachelor 84 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 44 8%
Researcher 42 8%
Other 92 17%
Unknown 86 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 74 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 71 13%
Psychology 67 12%
Social Sciences 61 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 57 10%
Other 91 17%
Unknown 122 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,564,098
of 21,105,374 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#640
of 1,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,635
of 142,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#5
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,105,374 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,830 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,891 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.