You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Longitudinal changes in EEG power, sleep cycles and behaviour in a tau model of neurodegeneration
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, July 2020
C. M. Holton, N. Hanley, E. Shanks, P. Oxley, A. McCarthy, B. J. Eastwood, T. K. Murray, A. Nickerson, K. A. Wafford
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||2||67%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||33%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||9||19%|
|Student > Bachelor||5||10%|
|Student > Master||5||10%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||2||4%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||8||17%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2020.
All research outputs
of 23,221,875 outputs
Outputs from Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
of 1,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 396,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,221,875 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,260 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.9. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.