You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Systematic reviews of ten pharmaceutical pricing policies – a research protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40545-020-00228-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Tordrup, Hendrika A. van den Ham, Julie Glanville, Aukje K. Mantel-Teeuwisse |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 17% |
| Researcher | 7 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 14 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 17% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 19% |
| Unknown | 15 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2022.
All research outputs
#6,298,523
of 23,274,744 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
#140
of 421 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,140
of 396,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
#10
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,274,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 421 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,993 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.