↓ Skip to main content

Establishing cross-systems collaborations for implementation: protocol for a longitudinal mixed methods study

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Establishing cross-systems collaborations for implementation: protocol for a longitudinal mixed methods study
Published in
Implementation Science, July 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13012-020-01016-9
Authors

Alicia C. Bunger, Emmeline Chuang, Amanda Girth, Kathryn E. Lancaster, Fawn Gadel, Marla Himmeger, Lisa Saldana, Byron J. Powell, Gregory A. Aarons

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 18 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 6 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 8%
Psychology 3 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 26 53%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2020.
All research outputs
#3,623,179
of 20,999,751 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#792
of 1,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,153
of 302,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,999,751 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them