You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Establishing cross-systems collaborations for implementation: protocol for a longitudinal mixed methods study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-020-01016-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alicia C. Bunger, Emmeline Chuang, Amanda Girth, Kathryn E. Lancaster, Fawn Gadel, Marla Himmeger, Lisa Saldana, Byron J. Powell, Gregory A. Aarons |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 64% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 7 | 64% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 18% |
| Unknown | 31 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 6% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 40 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2020.
All research outputs
#5,282,186
of 25,712,965 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#919
of 1,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,161
of 430,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#21
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,712,965 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,820 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.