You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Barriers to surgery performed by non-physician clinicians in sub-Saharan Africa—a scoping review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Human Resources for Health, July 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12960-020-00490-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Phylisha van Heemskerken, Henk Broekhuizen, Jakub Gajewski, Ruairí Brugha, Leon Bijlmakers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 14% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 11% |
Tanzania, United Republic of | 2 | 7% |
Kenya | 2 | 7% |
South Africa | 1 | 4% |
Canada | 1 | 4% |
Pakistan | 1 | 4% |
Somalia | 1 | 4% |
Ireland | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 12 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 20 | 71% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 18% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
Researcher | 7 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
Unspecified | 4 | 5% |
Other | 12 | 16% |
Unknown | 30 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 27% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 10% |
Unspecified | 4 | 5% |
Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 10% |
Unknown | 30 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,773,439
of 25,813,008 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#158
of 1,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,259
of 414,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#3
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,813,008 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 414,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.