You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effect of dexmedetomidine on vasopressor requirements in patients with septic shock: a subgroup analysis of the Sedation Practice in Intensive Care Evaluation [SPICE III] Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-03115-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luca Cioccari, Nora Luethi, Michael Bailey, Yahya Shehabi, Belinda Howe, Anna S. Messmer, Helena K. Proimos, Leah Peck, Helen Young, Glenn M. Eastwood, Tobias M. Merz, Jukka Takala, Stephan M. Jakob, Rinaldo Bellomo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 127 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 12% |
| Mexico | 14 | 11% |
| Colombia | 7 | 6% |
| Italy | 6 | 5% |
| Spain | 4 | 3% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| Sweden | 3 | 2% |
| Chile | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 26 | 20% |
| Unknown | 43 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 99 | 78% |
| Scientists | 13 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 89 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 10% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 19% |
| Unknown | 35 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 38 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 81. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2023.
All research outputs
#536,386
of 25,757,133 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#339
of 6,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,359
of 430,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#18
of 204 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,757,133 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 204 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.