↓ Skip to main content

Factors influencing the implementation of cardiovascular risk scoring in primary care: a mixed-method systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
31 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factors influencing the implementation of cardiovascular risk scoring in primary care: a mixed-method systematic review
Published in
Implementation Science, July 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13012-020-01022-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tonny B. Muthee, Derick Kimathi, Georgia C. Richards, Anthony Etyang, David Nunan, Veronika Williams, Carl Heneghan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 104 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 13%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Other 6 6%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 46 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Psychology 3 3%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 47 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,861,103
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#351
of 1,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,422
of 430,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#11
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.