↓ Skip to main content

Factors influencing the implementation of cardiovascular risk scoring in primary care: a mixed-method systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
32 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factors influencing the implementation of cardiovascular risk scoring in primary care: a mixed-method systematic review
Published in
Implementation Science, July 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13012-020-01022-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tonny B. Muthee, Derick Kimathi, Georgia C. Richards, Anthony Etyang, David Nunan, Veronika Williams, Carl Heneghan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 18%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 3 5%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 20 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 16%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 22 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,261,381
of 19,391,192 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#299
of 1,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,034
of 306,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,391,192 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,636 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them