↓ Skip to main content

Efficient In Vivo Introduction of Point Mutations Using ssODN and a Co-CRISPR Approach

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Procedures Online, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficient In Vivo Introduction of Point Mutations Using ssODN and a Co-CRISPR Approach
Published in
Biological Procedures Online, July 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12575-020-00123-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tgst Levi, Anna Sloutskin, Rachel Kalifa, Tamar Juven-Gershon, Offer Gerlitz

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 17%
Researcher 10 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Student > Master 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 23 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 11%
Neuroscience 5 8%
Engineering 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 22 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2021.
All research outputs
#7,229,289
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Biological Procedures Online
#57
of 171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,754
of 398,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Procedures Online
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 171 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.