You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A single-arm feasibility study of community-delivered Baduanjin (Qigong practice of the eight Brocades) training for frail older adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40814-020-00649-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiao Liu, Jean Wei Ting Seah, Benedict Wei Jun Pang, Mary Ann Tsao, Falong Gu, Wai Chong Ng, Junie Ying Ru Tay, Tze Pin Ng, Shiou Liang Wee |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Philippines | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 98 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
| Researcher | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 46 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 11% |
| Psychology | 11 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 50 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2020.
All research outputs
#15,617,824
of 23,221,875 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#737
of 1,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,633
of 399,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#25
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,221,875 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,055 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.