↓ Skip to main content

Evidence of an increased pathogenic footprint in the lingual microbiome of untreated HIV infected patients

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Microbiology, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evidence of an increased pathogenic footprint in the lingual microbiome of untreated HIV infected patients
Published in
BMC Microbiology, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2180-12-153
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angeline T Dang, Sean Cotton, Sumathi Sankaran-Walters, Chin-Shang Li, Chia-Yuan Michael Lee, Satya Dandekar, Bruce J Paster, Michael D George

Abstract

Opportunistic oral infections can be found in over 80% of HIV + patients, often causing debilitating lesions that also contribute to deterioration in nutritional health. Although appreciation for the role that the microbiota is likely to play in the initiation and/or enhancement of oral infections has grown considerably in recent years, little is known about the impact of HIV infection on host-microbe interactions within the oral cavity. In the current study, we characterize modulations in the bacterial composition of the lingual microbiome in patients with treated and untreated HIV infection. Bacterial species profiles were elucidated by microarray assay and compared between untreated HIV infected patients, HIV infected patients receiving antiretroviral therapy, and healthy HIV negative controls. The relationship between clinical parameters (viral burden and CD4+ T cell depletion) and the loss or gain of bacterial species was evaluated in each HIV patient group.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 5%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 89 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 17%
Student > Master 13 14%
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Professor 8 8%
Other 22 23%
Unknown 16 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 23%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 12%
Chemistry 3 3%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 16 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2012.
All research outputs
#23,010,126
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from BMC Microbiology
#2,961
of 3,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,743
of 179,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Microbiology
#52
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,513 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,386 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.