You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
New quality regulations versus established nursing home practice: a qualitative study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Nursing, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6955-11-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anne Marie Sandvoll, Kjell Kristoffersen, Solveig Hauge |
| Abstract |
Western governments have initiated reforms to improve the quality of care for nursing home residents. Most of these reforms encompass the use of regulations and national quality indicators. In the Norwegian context, these regulations comprise two pages of text that are easy to read and understand. They focus particularly on residents' rights to plan their day-to-day life in nursing homes. However, the research literature indicates that the implementation of the new regulations, particularly if they aim to change nursing practice, is extremely challenging. The aim of this study was to further explore and describe nursing practice to gain a deeper understanding of why it is so hard to implement the new regulations. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 45% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 18% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2012.
All research outputs
#13,667,301
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from BMC Nursing
#355
of 739 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,169
of 166,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Nursing
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 739 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them