You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Acceptability of condom promotion and distribution among 10–19 year-old adolescents in Mpwapwa and Mbeya rural districts, Tanzania
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, July 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-569 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Amon Exavery, Godfrey M Mubyazi, Jovitha Rugemalila, Adiel K Mushi, Julius J Massaga, Hamisi M Malebo, Filemon Tenu, Joyce K Ikingura, Sia Malekia, Emmanuel A Makundi, Acleus SM Ruta, John W Ogondiek, Victor Wiketye, Mwelecele N Malecela |
Abstract |
The HIV/AIDS pandemic remains a leading challenge for global health. Although condoms are acknowledged for their key role on preventing HIV transmission, low and inappropriate use of condoms persists in Tanzania and elsewhere in Africa. This study assesses factors affecting acceptability of condom promotion and distribution among adolescents in Mpwapwa and Mbeya rural districts of Tanzania. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 43% |
Canada | 1 | 14% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Tanzania, United Republic of | 7 | 5% |
India | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 120 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 30 | 23% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 13% |
Researcher | 16 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 7% |
Other | 23 | 18% |
Unknown | 21 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 21% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 17% |
Social Sciences | 20 | 16% |
Psychology | 8 | 6% |
Computer Science | 7 | 5% |
Other | 17 | 13% |
Unknown | 28 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,540,197
of 23,351,247 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,922
of 15,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,889
of 165,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#48
of 339 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,351,247 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,209 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 339 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.