↓ Skip to main content

Effects of sleep deprivation on central auditory processing

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Neuroscience, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of sleep deprivation on central auditory processing
Published in
BMC Neuroscience, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2202-13-83
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paulo Breno Noronha Liberalesso, Karlin Fabianne Klagenberg D’Andrea, Mara L Cordeiro, Bianca Simone Zeigelboim, Jair Mendes Marques, Ari Leon Jurkiewicz

Abstract

Sleep deprivation is extremely common in contemporary society, and is considered to be a frequent cause of behavioral disorders, mood, alertness, and cognitive performance. Although the impacts of sleep deprivation have been studied extensively in various experimental paradigms, very few studies have addressed the impact of sleep deprivation on central auditory processing (CAP). Therefore, we examined the impact of sleep deprivation on CAP, for which there is sparse information. In the present study, thirty healthy adult volunteers (17 females and 13 males, aged 30.75±7.14 years) were subjected to a pure tone audiometry test, a speech recognition threshold test, a speech recognition task, the Staggered Spondaic Word Test (SSWT), and the Random Gap Detection Test (RGDT). Baseline (BSL) performance was compared to performance after 24 hours of being sleep deprived (24hSD) using the Student's t test.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 84 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 20%
Student > Master 16 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Researcher 9 10%
Professor 7 8%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 20 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 24 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 9%
Neuroscience 7 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 8%
Engineering 5 6%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 22 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2019.
All research outputs
#6,128,425
of 23,988,888 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neuroscience
#271
of 1,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,428
of 166,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neuroscience
#6
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,988,888 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,266 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.