You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Introduction of birth dose of hepatitis B virus vaccine to the immunization program in Ethiopia: an economic evaluation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, July 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12962-020-00219-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Solomon Tessema Memirie, Hailemichael Desalegn, Mulugeta Naizgi, Mulat Nigus, Lisanu Taddesse, Yared Tadesse, Fasil Tessema, Meseret Zelalem, Tsinuel Girma |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Norway | 1 | 13% |
Kenya | 1 | 13% |
Ethiopia | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 13 | 21% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
Lecturer | 5 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Unknown | 26 | 42% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 18% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 13% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 8% |
Unknown | 32 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2020.
All research outputs
#5,857,123
of 24,153,435 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#181
of 454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,794
of 403,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#8
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,153,435 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.