You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Motion-corrected 3D whole-heart water-fat high-resolution late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, July 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12968-020-00649-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Camila Munoz, Aurelien Bustin, Radhouene Neji, Karl P. Kunze, Christoph Forman, Michaela Schmidt, Reza Hajhosseiny, Pier-Giorgio Masci, Martin Zeilinger, Wolfgang Wuest, René M. Botnar, Claudia Prieto |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 24% |
Chile | 1 | 6% |
Spain | 1 | 6% |
Egypt | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 10 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 13 | 76% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 12% |
Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 18% |
Researcher | 5 | 15% |
Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 18% |
Unknown | 10 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 9 | 26% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 26% |
Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 6% |
Mathematics | 2 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 10 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,555,181
of 25,523,622 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#118
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,185
of 430,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#4
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,523,622 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.