Title |
Scent dog identification of samples from COVID-19 patients – a pilot study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, July 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12879-020-05281-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Paula Jendrny, Claudia Schulz, Friederike Twele, Sebastian Meller, Maren von Köckritz-Blickwede, Albertus Dominicus Marcellinus Erasmus Osterhaus, Janek Ebbers, Veronika Pilchová, Isabell Pink, Tobias Welte, Michael Peter Manns, Anahita Fathi, Christiane Ernst, Marylyn Martina Addo, Esther Schalke, Holger Andreas Volk |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,995 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 290 | 15% |
Canada | 240 | 12% |
United Kingdom | 84 | 4% |
Japan | 82 | 4% |
Brazil | 74 | 4% |
Netherlands | 28 | 1% |
Ecuador | 23 | 1% |
Mexico | 19 | <1% |
Germany | 18 | <1% |
Other | 225 | 11% |
Unknown | 912 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1649 | 83% |
Scientists | 181 | 9% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 112 | 6% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 53 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 333 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 333 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 43 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 41 | 12% |
Student > Master | 32 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 9% |
Other | 19 | 6% |
Other | 58 | 17% |
Unknown | 110 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 16% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 35 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 7% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 16 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 5% |
Other | 67 | 20% |
Unknown | 124 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3076. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,123
of 25,782,229 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#3
of 8,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136
of 430,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#1
of 163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,704 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.