RT @carpe_diem0820: ヘルシンキの空港では犬の嗅ぎ分けによるCOVID-19患者のスクリーニングを試験的に導入 PCR検査によるスクリーニングと比べて、より安く、より速く、より効果的な評価ができる可能性 The Nose Needed for This Co…
@AnnaKorhonen3 Tässä ensimmäinen tutkimus aiheesta kesältä 2020. 15 sekunnin etsinnällä löytyi ainakin 6 muuta vanhaa tutkimusta koronakoirista. Eikö toimittajat enää tee mitään taustatyötä jutuilleen, vaikka se olisi nettiaikana niin helppoa... https://t.
RT @QBK_jitensya: COVID-19パンデミックが拡大し続ける中、SARS-CoV-2 感染者をリアルタイムで特定することは感染連鎖を遮断する上で極めて重要です 呼吸器感染症の際に生成される揮発性有機化合物は、特定の匂いの痕跡を引き起こす可能性があり、訓練を受け…
RT @carpe_diem0820: ヘルシンキの空港では犬の嗅ぎ分けによるCOVID-19患者のスクリーニングを試験的に導入 PCR検査によるスクリーニングと比べて、より安く、より速く、より効果的な評価ができる可能性 The Nose Needed for This Co…
COVID-19パンデミックが拡大し続ける中、SARS-CoV-2 感染者をリアルタイムで特定することは感染連鎖を遮断する上で極めて重要です 呼吸器感染症の際に生成される揮発性有機化合物は、特定の匂いの痕跡を引き起こす可能性があり、訓練を受けた犬はこれを高い精度で検出できます https://t.co/b8cz1MGXOo
RT @mayamaru_46: 犬によるコロナ罹患者の臭いを嗅ぎ分けるという研究。 犬が検出できる病原体特異的な臭いは揮発性有機化合物(VOC)の特定のパターンで構成されている場合がある(記事引用) ワクチン臭がわかる人はこのVOCの臭いがわかる人なんだろうね🤔 http…
RT @a_kruschke: @mayamaru_46 ../ https://t.co/7SSTkavj0v 私が住んでいる近くのフランスで採用された有名な犬がいます。 https://t.co/rf3kaQ41x1 ついにプログラムはすぐに停止した。公式な説明はない。🤔…
RT @mayamaru_46: 犬によるコロナ罹患者の臭いを嗅ぎ分けるという研究。 犬が検出できる病原体特異的な臭いは揮発性有機化合物(VOC)の特定のパターンで構成されている場合がある(記事引用) ワクチン臭がわかる人はこのVOCの臭いがわかる人なんだろうね🤔 http…
RT @mayamaru_46: 犬によるコロナ罹患者の臭いを嗅ぎ分けるという研究。 犬が検出できる病原体特異的な臭いは揮発性有機化合物(VOC)の特定のパターンで構成されている場合がある(記事引用) ワクチン臭がわかる人はこのVOCの臭いがわかる人なんだろうね🤔 http…
RT @a_kruschke: @mayamaru_46 ../ https://t.co/7SSTkavj0v 私が住んでいる近くのフランスで採用された有名な犬がいます。 https://t.co/rf3kaQ41x1 ついにプログラムはすぐに停止した。公式な説明はない。🤔…
犬によるコロナ罹患者の臭いを嗅ぎ分けるという研究。 犬が検出できる病原体特異的な臭いは揮発性有機化合物(VOC)の特定のパターンで構成されている場合がある(記事引用) ワクチン臭がわかる人はこのVOCの臭いがわかる人なんだろうね🤔 https://t.co/v08GyOgLzl
@mayamaru_46 ../ https://t.co/7SSTkavj0v 私が住んでいる近くのフランスで採用された有名な犬がいます。 https://t.co/rf3kaQ41x1 ついにプログラムはすぐに停止した。公式な説明はない。🤔 でも、この犬たちは神経症になったって言われたよ。😱 犬達に幸あれ🍀🙏。 /2.
#NationalDogDay seems like a very appropriate time to share this fascinating #FunFridayFact about dogs and #COVID19 #covid (More details about the study here: https://t.co/Y1yAPB0Wdb) https://t.co/7H50ehSWzy
RT @CrelaseV: Scent dog identification of samples from Covid-19 patients – a pilot study https://t.co/dD95WrV5v0 #Scent #DogIdentification…
Scent dog identification of samples from Covid-19 patients – a pilot study https://t.co/dD95WrV5v0 #Scent #DogIdentification #Covid-19
Not clear to me how exactly these scenarios were run, but previous methods (fn3) had dog select the odd one out: “For each trial run, only one hole presented a SARS-CoV-2 positive sample at a time while the other six holes presented negative samples.” http
@KaroGlowacka @HalikRafa @JPrzystajko @stradowski https://t.co/WlXB7ihnbR wyszkolone psy tropiące mogą identyfikować osoby zarażone SARS-CoV-2 / Po naukowcach z Hanoweru, naukowcy z Finlandii również przedstawili podobne wyniki –
@rleethescienceg @EricTopol It took them a week to train 8 dogs https://t.co/wx4vGXH4XX
@wargonm @DenizetSylve @mairiedu13 @Env_Alfort @olivierveran @jerome_coumet @panarmorix @Env_Alfort en aura surement plus, mais ça a commencé en 2020! https://t.co/LjXF9NwSOU
@calirunnerdoc @AMannanBaig @EricTopol It takes around 1 week to train a detection dog to identify COVID-19. If your facility has access to detection dogs and samples from COVID-19 patients, why not get your own? https://t.co/iN79N65anS
RT @pjbarrecheguren: Y el vídeo es parte de la publicación "Scent dog identification of samples from COVID-19 patients – a pilot study" (20…
Y el vídeo es parte de la publicación "Scent dog identification of samples from COVID-19 patients – a pilot study" (2020) https://t.co/cNuICRseVq
Scent dog identification of samples from COVID-19 patients – a pilot study - BMC Infectious Diseases. https://t.co/x8kIrlsHR8
Here is the actual piece of research. https://t.co/qubAEntvDT
RT @carpe_diem0820: ヘルシンキの空港では犬の嗅ぎ分けによるCOVID-19患者のスクリーニングを試験的に導入 PCR検査によるスクリーニングと比べて、より安く、より速く、より効果的な評価ができる可能性 The Nose Needed for This Co…
RT @carpe_diem0820: ヘルシンキの空港では犬の嗅ぎ分けによるCOVID-19患者のスクリーニングを試験的に導入 PCR検査によるスクリーニングと比べて、より安く、より速く、より効果的な評価ができる可能性 The Nose Needed for This Co…
@VertWolf Not necessarily as good, but yes. See: https://t.co/8BoBg8wPZt
@phathead Evidence exists for using dogs sense of smell for diagnostics. They can be more accurate than rapid tests and faster still: https://t.co/I1b7n0VA4d Also general info from pod about using dogs for diagnostics in general: https://t.co/q3M7YxsyIx
RT @3104aba: @Lyrica_noie 私も探してました。犬の関わってるこれではないですよね…? https://t.co/2SGdDxdMCY
@Lyrica_noie 私も探してました。犬の関わってるこれではないですよね…? https://t.co/2SGdDxdMCY
@Elliot_43 @cbcnewsbc @DrBonnieHenry @adriandix @jjhorgan @JM_Whiteside Wow. Dogs had and overall average detection rate of 94% of #Covid19 positives during the presentation of 1012 randomised samples. That's pretty amazing They should get BC #LTCH to h
@moslem_monfared @ARoquentin1979 @yaserarabshaban برو حداقل انگلیسی رو یاد بگیر 😅 نتونستی بخونی؟؟؟ کاش بسیجی ها اندازه یکی از فواید سگ مفید بودند https://t.co/ofMzjrsDnC
@moslem_monfared @ARoquentin1979 @yaserarabshaban اخه نادان تو حتی انگلیسی هم بلد نیستی من به المانیشم متوجه میشم این روش موفقیت امیز بود و در تمام فرودگاهها ازش استفاده شد واقعا شما ها به هیجچ دردی تو مملکت نیمخورید مصرف کننده و بیسوادین https://t.co/86
@CabirolGerard J'ai du mal à identifier à quel degré c'est dit. Ca a été évalué de manière tout à fait rigoureuse, ça montre qu'il faut éviter de juger qqch juste sur 1 impression. Les chiens renifleur de drogue, ca ne surprend pas grd monde, c'est le même
This is doggone amazing! 🐕 Turns out that COVID-sniffing canines could join the ranks of healthcare heroes. Read more in the study here: ➡️https://t.co/Y1yAPBixBL #FunFridayFact #covid #covid19 https://t.co/3PYNsx0tA4
@drbarnesbangor @DrEricDing Many articles & papers. Here’s one. https://t.co/WFwlkOGzWp
@MicrochipMakes @make @kartben @dalepd @seeedstudio @EdgeImpulse Now all he has to do is make it sniff out COVID-19. Apparently it can be done, as it is being done with specially trained K9's. One article: https://t.co/FDd2sDZaO6 👃
@Sophiecbrr1 Are we still at this? They keep rolling this one out. Where are all the dogs? Still testing, like last July https://t.co/AUYZfUeNVX
@Jan34733995 🐕Psy rozpoznawać #Covid19 nauczyła Bundeswehra, powiodły się też szkolenia psów w Chile i Wielkiej Brytanii – gdzie pewna fundacja udowodniła, że potrafią to robić z powodzeniem psy ze schronisk, co im może zapewnić wdzięczność i michę do końc
@IrishTimes This has been known since July last year !!! Why are the government not using trained sniffer dogs at airports ?!!! https://t.co/WnrfuUtp3W
จริงๆ คือ ถ้ามันเป็นตัว Research เดียวกันอะ มันมาตั้งแต่ July 2020 แล้วนะ 55555 แต่ก็ยังไม่ได้อ่านละเอียดเหมือนกัน https://t.co/tkxgcCJuMk
@DrAliSKhan @shisha_de It's here. Handlers present but the handlers didn't know which sample was which and the sample was presented to the dog by an automatic device and handlers stood behind the dog. https://t.co/cgWJQJFM9p https://t.co/oQljYyfh8O
@ennolenze hund statt app. eine woche schnueffeltraining reicht. https://t.co/tRWD6TBTVd
@srbininfo Ја се више уздам у кучиће https://t.co/i8TWKxfwNk
@zombie_high https://t.co/G2zfMzh6nR I mean this idea has been toted around for about a year now so it's not really that farfetched
@projectbluework @marciobarcelos @NPR @WFAE Then it’s on the training, wrong breed. Ever watch a bird dog, bloodhound etc at work, just naturally without any training. Too many dog grifting going on, I agree, but it’s not the dog’s fault. High %(90+) ac
@GranstromOlavi @riikka_kevo @vvihne Muuten, oletko huomannut tämän? https://t.co/mAJ6QfFugM
@Correctioneer @Reverend_Lyn @LoneWolf343 @BadLegalTakes Again, the only thing that was wrong was the link. Here is the peer-reviewed scientific study that explains in numerical detail why the 94% number is correct. You want to argue with that, be my guest
@Correctioneer @Reverend_Lyn @LoneWolf343 @BadLegalTakes So, a) didn't realize that's what happened. I can admit to being a dick for deleting a tweet. b) What you missed was this article, which is a peer-reviewed study mentioned false results that indicate
@Correctioneer @Reverend_Lyn @LoneWolf343 @BadLegalTakes Actually, you know what? Those are the rates for the PCR test. This one has the rates for dogs. https://t.co/joAxK6ggOM
新コロ感染探知犬、94%で陽性者を識別ってめちゃ凄いー!!! ハノーバー獣医科大学(ドイツ)の研究って面白いの多い!! 協定結んでるんだから酪農もファイトーです。。 https://t.co/f6Jemb9Nk9
@EliasAarnio @MikaelNiku @vvihne @SuomenTulli Ei kai tulli tee tieteelisiä tutkimuksia vaan kouluttaa koiria? https://t.co/ypopo26tkH
@RautioPentti Eli Tullin kaverit mutuilivat prosenteillaan? Ainoa paperi jonka olen löytänyt on tämä. https://t.co/uvwgJpfW73
@JuhaniKnuuti @anttivaris @KirsiVarhila @STM_Uutiset Tämän taisin silloin löytää. Joku koirankouluttaja piti sitä huonona. Jaan kritiikittä, koska en muuta ole löytänyt. https://t.co/uvwgJpfW73
@MikaelNiku @1st_sealord Koirathan eivät tee testiä vaan ne merkaavaat testattavia. Ei huumekoira etsi huumeita vaan ne merkkaavat mistä oli syytä etsiä. Tehokaampia nuo on kun joku kuumemittaus tms mitä on käyetty seulontaan. https://t.co/ypopo26tkH
@UberFacts Dogs are now being trained to detect Covid too. https://t.co/QUDuN7K2gV
Recent study proved #sniffingdogs to have more than 80% accuracy in detecting #COVID19 positive patients/passengers. Currently this method is actively used in, for example, Helsinki airport, as well as in some locations in the #USA. 💝🐶🐶💖 https://t.co/JqHG
2) Dogs can be trained to detected #SARSCoV2 infection in humans: The pilot study below gives a 96% specificity & 83% sensitivity, with 94% correct identification in 1012 random samples, after 1 week of training – here on saliva and airway samples. h
@kkrasuski podstawy to akurat ma https://t.co/lzrHOgfoZq
RT @mimimibe: Interessant, wie in keinem dieser "Hunde erschnüffeln Covid"-Artikel darauf eingegangen wird, wie verhindert wird, dass sich…
@naomirwolf @wef Interesting that WEF didn't include a link to the study. In this small study samples came from "hospitalised and clinically diseased SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals" https://t.co/rAueIFBdBa Does that mean actual sick people with respirato
@choo_ek @FGossGraves This study looks good: https://t.co/9jM2X7S1G7
@julinav426 @SamBrockNBC @MiamiHEAT @NBCNews https://t.co/9jM2X7S1G7 "Within randomised and automated 1012 sample presentations, dogs achieved an overall average detection rate of 94% (±3.4%) with 157 correct indications of positive, 792 correct rejections
@vvihne @HeikkiRay @LindenAki @THLorg Lehtiartikkeli Italiasta on sinun tietolähteesi? Koska minulla on näyttää tieteellisiä artikkeleita, toisin kuin sinulla. https://t.co/mAJ6QfFugM
🤣🤣🤣
RT @staringispolite: @brucedaisley 94% accuracy... on saliva samples If they’re just walking past people’s shins this is not gonna go well…
@PeterRiebeek1 @brucedaisley In the main study, they ‘deactivate’ the sample. https://t.co/banQzXNGmA
@brucedaisley 94% accuracy... on saliva samples If they’re just walking past people’s shins this is not gonna go well https://t.co/8FMnM7ZqSp
@vvihne @unique_anonym @LindenAki @THLorg The dogs were able to discriminate between samples of infected and non-infected individuals with average diagnostic sensitivity of 82.63% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 82.02–83.24%) and specificity of 96.35% (95%
@Lastmedic @NBCNews theres loads https://t.co/OGImNmZ047
@CommonComments @CBSNews It is...similar to a Diabetic dog who can smell when blood sugar changes and alert the owner. Dogs sense of smell is amazing. In this case, if the dog senses Covid, he/she sits....if not they are trained to keep walking. https://
@Breaking911 good dogs ☺️ https://t.co/AxefYCBine https://t.co/t3tRJzv6FA
@CRAZYSHANK @PatMcAfeeShow https://t.co/1moJW51yXL here's a research paper on it. they're not 100% accurate but pretty darn close lol
@excusememe_wtf @PatMcAfeeShow https://t.co/1moJW51yXL here's the report from one of the earlier experiments, apparently covid has a distinct smell to dogs
@fox_sheldon @wsvn https://t.co/0udkr2n8hm I was curious and came across this study showing surprisingly high sensitivity and great specificity
https://t.co/pIzeo60e6t Gentee quero um dog desses
Ya existen mucho, Manuel!!! https://t.co/MT0v9dXXq8
RT @SeanLucan: What the What? @MiamiHEAT to use #COVID19-sniffing #dogs to screen fans at games https://t.co/nMln53kdv5 via @AP #SARSCov2…
What the What? @MiamiHEAT to use #COVID19-sniffing #dogs to screen fans at games https://t.co/nMln53kdv5 via @AP #SARSCov2 #canine #testing #science Some evidence. Intriguing. https://t.co/mIqCAIWFUu https://t.co/Vp41SpFjAk https://t.co/z2Vn3xmHJt http
The "accuracy" of a simple Y/N test like a COVID-sniffing dog actually breaks down into how often the dog correctly IDs 1. infected and 2. uninfected people. In testing jargon, 1 is called "sensitivity," 2 is "specificity." These are 86.3% and 96.4%. ht
@PKD3liveranc3 Ya I don’t get it either but here’s a study https://t.co/KNwzKRpTf8
so, i saw a story on how the Miami Heat NBA team is going to use covid-19 sniffing dogs to check all fans trying to enter their arena. so, i go look for some research and find this article. 94% accuracy in this study! dogs are the best https://t.co/3d6r
Scent dog identification of samples from COVID-19 patients – a pilot study | BMC Infectious Diseases | Full Text https://t.co/AvZU2BlUT2
RT @JonMarronMD: Its telling that this quotes the team exec *business* VP to explain rationale for their plan to use dogs to "sniff screen"…
Um... 82% sensitive and 94% specific https://t.co/nU9teiLejL and 76-100% accurate (not a test characteristic). https://t.co/uMOe7f3gaX @MiamiHEAT are going to refund their money? Please tell me this is part of a larger study...
@CouchCushionPax @Dan_Getz @BleacherReport @ByTimReynolds It’s really not, a study released in July showed that after a week of training, dogs could detect COVID at an average detection rate of 94%. https://t.co/HeGbkg3e51