↓ Skip to main content

Activation of myeloid dendritic cells, effector cells and regulatory T cells in lichen planus

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Activation of myeloid dendritic cells, effector cells and regulatory T cells in lichen planus
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, June 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12967-016-0938-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rosana Domingues, Gabriel Costa de Carvalho, Valéria Aoki, Alberto José da Silva Duarte, Maria Notomi Sato

Abstract

Lichen planus (LP) is a chronic mucocutaneous inflammatory disease. Evaluating the balance between regulatory T cells and effector T cells could be useful for monitoring the proinflammatory profile of LP. Therefore, this study aimed to assess populations of dendritic cells (DCs) and regulatory and effector T cells in peripheral blood samples collected from patients with LP to evaluate the polyfunctionality of T cells upon toll-like receptor (TLR) activation. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells collected from 18 patients with LP and 22 healthy control subjects were stimulated with agonists of TLR4, TLR7, TLR7/TLR8 or TLR9. Frequencies of circulating IFN-α(+) plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs); TNF-α(+) myeloid DCs (mDCs); regulatory T cells (Tregs); and IL-17-, IL-10-, IL-22-, TNF-, and IFN-γ-secreting T cells were assessed via flow cytometry. The frequencies of regulatory CD4(+) and CD8(+)CD25(+)Foxp3(+)CD127(low/-) T cells and TNF-α(+) mDCs were induced following activation with TLR4, TLR7 and TLR8 agonists in the LP group. Moreover, increased baseline frequencies of CD4(+)IL-10(+) T cells and CD8(+)IL-22(+) or IFN-γ(+)T cells were found. In the LP group, TLR4 activation induced an increased frequency of CD4(+)IFN-γ(+) T cells, while TLR7/8 and staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB) activation induced an increased frequency of CD8(+) IL-22(+) T cells. An increased frequency of polyfunctional CD4(+) T cells that simultaneously secreted 3 of the evaluated cytokines (not including IL-10) was verified upon TLR7/8/9 activation, while polyfunctional CD8(+) T cells were already detectable at baseline. TLR-mediated activation of the innate immune response induced the production of proinflammatory mDCs, Tregs and polyfunctional T cells in patients with LP. Therefore, TLR activation has an adjuvant role in inducing both innate and adaptive immune responses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 22%
Student > Master 3 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 7 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 3 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Materials Science 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2019.
All research outputs
#13,238,608
of 22,876,619 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#1,521
of 4,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,991
of 345,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#37
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,876,619 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,004 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.