↓ Skip to main content

Multicenter, phase II clinical trial of cancer vaccination for advanced esophageal cancer with three peptides derived from novel cancer-testis antigens

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
125 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multicenter, phase II clinical trial of cancer vaccination for advanced esophageal cancer with three peptides derived from novel cancer-testis antigens
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/1479-5876-10-141
Pubmed ID
Authors

Koji Kono, Hisae Iinuma, Yasunori Akutsu, Hiroaki Tanaka, Naoko Hayashi, Yasuto Uchikado, Tsuyoshi Noguchi, Hideki Fujii, Kota Okinaka, Ryoji Fukushima, Hisahiro Matsubara, Masaichi Ohira, Hideo Baba, Shoji Natsugoe, Seigou Kitano, Kazuyoshi Takeda, Koji Yoshida, Takuya Tsunoda, Yusuke Nakamura

Abstract

Since a phase I clinical trial using three HLA-A24-binding peptides from TTK protein kinase (TTK), lymphocyte antigen-6 complex locus K (LY6K), and insulin-like growth factor-II mRNA binding protein-3 (IMP3) had been shown to be promising for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), we further performed a multicenter, non-randomized phase II clinical trial.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 64 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 17%
Researcher 10 15%
Other 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Other 16 25%
Unknown 11 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 6%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 13 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2012.
All research outputs
#18,312,024
of 22,673,450 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#2,925
of 3,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,811
of 164,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#37
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,673,450 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,955 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.