↓ Skip to main content

The pathophysiology of ‘happy’ hypoxemia in COVID-19

Overview of attention for article published in Respiratory Research, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 2,376)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
986 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
139 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
550 Mendeley
Title
The pathophysiology of ‘happy’ hypoxemia in COVID-19
Published in
Respiratory Research, July 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12931-020-01462-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sebastiaan Dhont, Eric Derom, Eva Van Braeckel, Pieter Depuydt, Bart N. Lambrecht

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 986 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 550 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 550 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 84 15%
Student > Postgraduate 56 10%
Student > Master 53 10%
Other 51 9%
Researcher 38 7%
Other 106 19%
Unknown 162 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 230 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 46 8%
Engineering 13 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 2%
Neuroscience 11 2%
Other 54 10%
Unknown 183 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 787. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2021.
All research outputs
#14,621
of 19,151,080 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#2
of 2,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#805
of 306,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,151,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,376 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them