↓ Skip to main content

Glyphosate and adverse pregnancy outcomes, a systematic review of observational studies

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
85 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
232 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Glyphosate and adverse pregnancy outcomes, a systematic review of observational studies
Published in
BMC Public Health, June 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12889-016-3153-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessica S. A. de Araujo, Isabella F. Delgado, Francisco J. R. Paumgartten

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 85 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 232 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 17%
Student > Bachelor 34 15%
Researcher 25 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 10%
Professor 13 6%
Other 40 17%
Unknown 58 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 4%
Other 50 22%
Unknown 69 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 118. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2024.
All research outputs
#360,421
of 25,753,031 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#322
of 17,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,021
of 356,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#6
of 206 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 206 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.