↓ Skip to main content

Outcomes of wildlife translocations in protected areas: what is the type and extent of existing evidence? A systematic map protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Outcomes of wildlife translocations in protected areas: what is the type and extent of existing evidence? A systematic map protocol
Published in
Environmental Evidence, July 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13750-020-00199-4
Authors

Joseph Langridge, Romain Sordello, Yorick Reyjol

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 17%
Student > Master 9 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Researcher 6 10%
Professor 2 3%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 15 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 16 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 20 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,788,767
of 24,265,140 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#112
of 315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,185
of 403,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,265,140 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.