You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effectiveness of gender-targeted versus gender-neutral interventions aimed at improving dietary intake, physical activity and/or overweight/obesity in young adults (aged 17–35 years): a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12937-020-00594-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas Sharkey, Megan C. Whatnall, Melinda J. Hutchesson, Rebecca L. Haslam, Aaron Bezzina, Clare E. Collins, Lee M. Ashton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 9 | 36% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Belgium | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 12 | 48% |
| Members of the public | 7 | 28% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 24% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 88 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 9% |
| Researcher | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 47 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 16% |
| Psychology | 8 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 49 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,002,260
of 24,379,758 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#484
of 1,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,407
of 403,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#8
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,379,758 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,468 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,247 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.