↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of gender-targeted versus gender-neutral interventions aimed at improving dietary intake, physical activity and/or overweight/obesity in young adults (aged 17–35 years): a systematic…

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
26 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness of gender-targeted versus gender-neutral interventions aimed at improving dietary intake, physical activity and/or overweight/obesity in young adults (aged 17–35 years): a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Nutrition Journal, July 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12937-020-00594-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Sharkey, Megan C. Whatnall, Melinda J. Hutchesson, Rebecca L. Haslam, Aaron Bezzina, Clare E. Collins, Lee M. Ashton

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Master 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Lecturer 3 5%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 26 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 20%
Psychology 7 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 27 46%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,634,390
of 20,494,250 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#429
of 1,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,602
of 308,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,494,250 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,369 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them