↓ Skip to main content

Beyond differential expression: the quest for causal mutations and effector molecules

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Beyond differential expression: the quest for causal mutations and effector molecules
Published in
BMC Genomics, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-13-356
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas J Hudson, Brian P Dalrymple, Antonio Reverter

Abstract

High throughput gene expression technologies are a popular choice for researchers seeking molecular or systems-level explanations of biological phenomena. Nevertheless, there has been a groundswell of opinion that these approaches have not lived up to the hype because the interpretation of the data has lagged behind its generation. In our view a major problem has been an over-reliance on isolated lists of differentially expressed (DE) genes which - by simply comparing genes to themselves - have the pitfall of taking molecular information out of context. Numerous scientists have emphasised the need for better context. This can be achieved through holistic measurements of differential connectivity in addition to, or in replacement, of DE. However, many scientists continue to use isolated lists of DE genes as the major source of input data for common readily available analytical tools. Focussing this opinion article on our own research in skeletal muscle, we outline our resolutions to these problems - particularly a universally powerful way of quantifying differential connectivity. With a well designed experiment, it is now possible to use gene expression to identify causal mutations and the other major effector molecules with whom they cooperate, irrespective of whether they themselves are DE. We explain why, for various reasons, no other currently available experimental techniques or quantitative analyses are capable of reaching these conclusions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 4%
Brazil 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 128 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 26%
Researcher 35 25%
Student > Master 12 9%
Professor 11 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Other 30 21%
Unknown 6 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 83 59%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 12%
Computer Science 8 6%
Mathematics 5 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 3%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 12 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2013.
All research outputs
#14,599,159
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#4,932
of 11,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,183
of 178,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#79
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,868 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.