↓ Skip to main content

What criteria do decision makers in Thailand use to set priorities for vaccine introduction?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What criteria do decision makers in Thailand use to set priorities for vaccine introduction?
Published in
BMC Public Health, August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12889-016-3382-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Siriporn Pooripussarakul, Arthorn Riewpaiboon, David Bishai, Charung Muangchana, Sripen Tantivess

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 107 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 17%
Researcher 16 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Lecturer 6 6%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 34 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 7%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 4%
Other 21 20%
Unknown 37 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2020.
All research outputs
#7,618,361
of 23,225,652 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#8,062
of 15,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,043
of 368,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#198
of 374 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,225,652 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,161 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 374 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.