↓ Skip to main content

Mid-term follow-up after aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier Edwards Magna Ease prosthesis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mid-term follow-up after aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier Edwards Magna Ease prosthesis
Published in
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, August 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13019-020-01248-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Taufiek K. Rajab, Jason M. Ali, Jules Hernández-Sánchez, Jennifer Mackie, Vincenzo Grimaudo, Silvia Sinichino, Christine Mills, Bushra Rana, John Dunning, Yasir Abu-Omar

Abstract

Approximately 250,000 heart valve operations are performed annually worldwide. An intensive research and development effort has led to progressively more advanced heart valve prostheses. The Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna Ease (CEPME) prosthesis represents the latest iteration of the Edwards Perimount series of aortic tissue valves. The current study aims to evaluate the midterm performance of this bioprosthesis. Five hundred and eighteen patients with aortic stenosis underwent aortic valve replacement with the CEPME valve at Papworth Hospital between August 2008 and November 2011. After a minimum of 3 years from the index operation, eligible patients were retrospectively and consecutively recruited to participate. Recruitment was closed after 100 eligible patients had completed all study assessments. Investigations at follow-up included echocardiography, and NYHA status. Primary endpoints included valve performance measures. The mean age was 72 years, 64% were male and median follow-up was 5.1 years. NYHA status had improved in 66% of patients. The average postoperative peak and mean pressure gradients decreased by 51.2 mmHg (64.5%) and 31.8 mmHg (59.4%), with a significant improvement in NYHA status. The frequency of moderate aortic regurgitation was 3%. There was no evidence for structural valve deterioration. The CEPME has excellent mid-term durability. Its use effectively improves haemodynamics and functional capacity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 20%
Lecturer 1 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Unknown 6 60%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 1 10%
Computer Science 1 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 10%
Engineering 1 10%
Unknown 6 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2020.
All research outputs
#15,090,332
of 23,225,652 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#346
of 1,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,248
of 398,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#10
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,225,652 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,260 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,585 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.