↓ Skip to main content

Detection of multiple drug-resistant Trypanosoma congolense populations in village cattle of south-east Mali

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Detection of multiple drug-resistant Trypanosoma congolense populations in village cattle of south-east Mali
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1756-3305-5-155
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erick O Mungube, Hervé S Vitouley, Emmanuel Allegye-Cudjoe, Oumar Diall, Zakaria Boucoum, Boucader Diarra, Yousouf Sanogo, Thomas Randolph, Burkhard Bauer, Karl-Hans Zessin, Peter-Henning Clausen

Abstract

Tsetse fly-transmitted African animal trypanosomosis causes annual losses that run into billions of dollars. The disease is assumed to cause hunger and poverty in most sub-Saharan countries since it represents a serious impediment to sustainable livestock production. Both a cross-sectional and a longitudinal study were carried out from November to December 2007 to evaluate trypanosomosis risk and susceptibility of trypanosomes to trypanocidal drug treatment in village cattle populations in south-east Mali.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Uganda 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 121 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 25%
Researcher 20 16%
Student > Master 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 18 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 17%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 10 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 3%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 21 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2020.
All research outputs
#4,433,666
of 22,673,450 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#950
of 5,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,714
of 164,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#4
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,673,450 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,427 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.