You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Modeling blood–brain barrier pathology in cerebrovascular disease in vitro: current and future paradigms
|
---|---|
Published in |
Fluids and Barriers of the CNS, July 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12987-020-00202-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anuska V. Andjelkovic, Svetlana M. Stamatovic, Chelsea M. Phillips, Gabriela Martinez-Revollar, Richard F. Keep |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 92 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 22% |
Researcher | 15 | 16% |
Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
Professor | 2 | 2% |
Other | 9 | 10% |
Unknown | 30 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 11% |
Neuroscience | 9 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 7% |
Engineering | 6 | 7% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 7% |
Other | 21 | 23% |
Unknown | 34 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2020.
All research outputs
#4,356,616
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
#92
of 384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,371
of 398,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 384 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,157 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.