You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Decision boxes for clinicians to support evidence-based practice and shared decision making: the user experience
|
---|---|
Published in |
Implementation Science, August 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-7-72 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anik Giguere, France Légaré, Roland Grad, Pierre Pluye, R Brian Haynes, Michel Cauchon, François Rousseau, Juliana Alvarez Argote, Michel Labrecque |
Abstract |
This project engages patients and physicians in the development of Decision Boxes, short clinical topic summaries covering medical questions that have no single best answer. Decision Boxes aim to prepare the clinician to communicate the risks and benefits of the available options to the patient so they can make an informed decision together. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 3 | 33% |
United States | 1 | 11% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
Sweden | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 33% |
Members of the public | 3 | 33% |
Scientists | 2 | 22% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 2 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
United States | 2 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 174 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 14% |
Student > Master | 23 | 13% |
Researcher | 22 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 16 | 9% |
Other | 37 | 20% |
Unknown | 37 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 23% |
Social Sciences | 26 | 14% |
Psychology | 15 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 7% |
Computer Science | 9 | 5% |
Other | 27 | 15% |
Unknown | 50 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2013.
All research outputs
#6,318,221
of 25,262,379 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,014
of 1,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,469
of 170,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#15
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,262,379 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,795 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.