You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of obesity and low back pain on spinal mobility: a cross sectional study in women
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1743-0003-7-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luca Vismara, Francesco Menegoni, Fabio Zaina, Manuela Galli, Stefano Negrini, Paolo Capodaglio |
| Abstract |
obesity is nowadays a pandemic condition. Obese subjects are commonly characterized by musculoskeletal disorders and particularly by non-specific chronic low back pain (cLBP). However, the relationship between obesity and cLBP remains to date unsupported by an objective measurement of the mechanical behaviour of the spine and its morphology in obese subjects. Such analysis may provide a deeper understanding of the relationships between function and the onset of clinical symptoms. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| San Marino | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Malta | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 205 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 11% |
| Other | 19 | 9% |
| Researcher | 18 | 9% |
| Other | 50 | 24% |
| Unknown | 38 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 82 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 11% |
| Engineering | 18 | 9% |
| Sports and Recreations | 17 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 10% |
| Unknown | 44 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2013.
All research outputs
#12,665,716
of 22,673,450 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#565
of 1,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,483
of 163,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,673,450 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,277 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.