↓ Skip to main content

Framing the decision to contract out elderly care and primary health care services – perspectives of local level politicians and civil servants in Finland

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Framing the decision to contract out elderly care and primary health care services – perspectives of local level politicians and civil servants in Finland
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-12-201
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liina-Kaisa Tynkkynen, Juhani Lehto, Sari Miettinen

Abstract

In the literature there are only few empirical studies that analyse the decision makers' reasoning to contract out health care and social services to private sector. However, the decisions on the delivery patterns of health care and social services are considered to be of great importance as they have a potential to influence citizens' access to services and even affect their health. This study contributes to filling this cap by exploring the frames used by Finnish local authorities as they talk about contracting out of primary health care and elderly care services. Contracting with the private sector has gained increasing popularity, in Finland, during the past decade, as a practise of organising health care and social services.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 77 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 18 23%
Unknown 15 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 22 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 16 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2012.
All research outputs
#14,148,857
of 22,673,450 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#5,032
of 7,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,956
of 143,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#80
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,673,450 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.