You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The cathepsin S cysteine proteinase of the burrowing nematode Radopholus similis is essential for the reproduction and invasion
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell & Bioscience, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13578-016-0107-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ke Wang, Yu Li, Xin Huang, Dong-wei Wang, Chun-ling Xu, Hui Xie |
| Abstract |
The nematode Radopholus similis is an important migratory endoparasite of plants. Cysteine proteinases such as cathepsin S (CPS) play key roles during embryonic development, invasion, and pathogenesis in nematodes and many other animal parasites. This study was designed to investigate the molecular characterization and functions of a cathepsin S protease in R. similis and to find new targets for its control. Rs-CPS of R. similis, Hg-CPS of Heterodera glycines and Ha-CPS of H. avenae are closely genetically related and share the same branch of the phylogenetic tree. Rs-cps is a multi-copy gene that is expressed in the esophageal glands, ovaries, testes, vas deferens, and eggs of R. similis. Rs-cps mRNA transcripts are expressed at varying levels during all developmental stages of R. similis. Rs-cps expression was highest in females. The neurostimulant octopamine did not significantly enhance the ingestion of the dsRNA soaking solution by R. similis but instead had a detrimental effect on nematode activity. The dsRNA soaking solution diffused into the body of R. similis not only through the esophageal lumen but also through the amphids, excretory duct, vagina, anus and cloacal orifice. We confirmed that RNAi significantly suppressed the expression level of Rs-cps and reproductive capability and pathogenicity of R. similis. Our results demonstrate that Rs-cps plays important roles in the reproduction, parasitism and pathogenesis of R. similis and could be used as a new potential target for controlling plant parasitic nematodes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 21% |
| Researcher | 3 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 43% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 21% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 1 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2016.
All research outputs
#19,073,347
of 24,288,533 outputs
Outputs from Cell & Bioscience
#521
of 1,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,013
of 351,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell & Bioscience
#7
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,288,533 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,075 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.