↓ Skip to main content

Service provision and barriers to care for homeless people with mental health problems across 14 European capital cities

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Service provision and barriers to care for homeless people with mental health problems across 14 European capital cities
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-12-222
Pubmed ID
Authors

Réamonn Canavan, Margaret M Barry, Aleksandra Matanov, Henrique Barros, Edina Gabor, Tim Greacen, Petra Holcnerová, Ulrike Kluge, Pablo Nicaise, Jacek Moskalewicz, José Manuel Díaz-Olalla, Christa Straßmayr, Aart H Schene, Joaquim J F Soares, Andrea Gaddini, Stefan Priebe

Abstract

Mental health problems are disproportionately higher amongst homeless people. Many barriers exist for homeless people with mental health problems in accessing treatment yet little research has been done on service provision and quality of care for this group. The aim of this paper is to assess current service provision and identify barriers to care for homeless people with mental health problems in 14 European capital cities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Unknown 162 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 20%
Researcher 20 12%
Student > Bachelor 20 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Other 28 17%
Unknown 33 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 18%
Social Sciences 26 16%
Psychology 14 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 2%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 40 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2013.
All research outputs
#5,690,120
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#2,454
of 7,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,198
of 165,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#23
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,804 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.