↓ Skip to main content

The effects of four hypocaloric diets containing different levels of sucrose or high fructose corn syrup on weight loss and related parameters

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
54 X users
facebook
21 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
video
5 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effects of four hypocaloric diets containing different levels of sucrose or high fructose corn syrup on weight loss and related parameters
Published in
Nutrition Journal, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-11-55
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joshua Lowndes, Diana Kawiecki, Sabrina Pardo, Von Nguyen, Kathleen J Melanson, Zhiping Yu, James M Rippe

Abstract

The replacement of sucrose with HFCS in food products has been suggested as playing a role in the development of obesity as a public health issue. The objective of this study was to examine the effects of four equally hypocaloric diets containing different levels of sucrose or high fructose corn syrup (HFCS).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Austria 1 <1%
Cyprus 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 152 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 46 29%
Student > Master 21 13%
Researcher 16 10%
Other 12 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 8%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 28 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 11%
Sports and Recreations 11 7%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Other 33 21%
Unknown 36 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2023.
All research outputs
#603,383
of 24,985,232 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#186
of 1,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,926
of 172,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#6
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,985,232 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,496 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,976 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.