↓ Skip to main content

CD133+CXCR4+ colon cancer cells exhibit metastatic potential and predict poor prognosis of patients

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
138 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CD133+CXCR4+ colon cancer cells exhibit metastatic potential and predict poor prognosis of patients
Published in
BMC Medicine, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-10-85
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shan-shan Zhang, Zhi-peng Han, Ying-ying Jing, Shuang-fen Tao, Tie-jun Li, Hao Wang, Yang Wang, Rong Li, Yang Yang, Xue Zhao, Xiao-dong Xu, En-da Yu, Yao-cheng Rui, Hou-jia Liu, Li Zhang, Li-xin Wei

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC), which frequently metastasizes to the liver, is one of the three leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Growing evidence suggests that a subset of cells exists among cancer stem cells. This distinct subpopulation is thought to contribute to liver metastasis; however, it has not been fully explored in CRC yet.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 3%
Portugal 1 1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 1%
Unknown 75 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 13 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 18 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2012.
All research outputs
#3,614,045
of 25,402,528 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#2,089
of 4,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,500
of 184,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#31
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,528 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,012 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.5. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,493 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.