↓ Skip to main content

An empirical evaluation of two-stage species tree inference strategies using a multilocus dataset from North American pines

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An empirical evaluation of two-stage species tree inference strategies using a multilocus dataset from North American pines
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-14-67
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael DeGiorgio, John Syring, Andrew J Eckert, Aaron Liston, Richard Cronn, David B Neale, Noah A Rosenberg

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Mexico 2 4%
Switzerland 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
New Zealand 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Poland 1 2%
Unknown 36 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 36%
Student > Master 9 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 18%
Professor 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 1 2%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 76%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 9%
Computer Science 2 4%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Unknown 3 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2016.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#2,928
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,357
of 238,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#54
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.