↓ Skip to main content

Clonidine in the treatment of adolescent chronic fatigue syndrome: a pilot study for the NorCAPITAL trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clonidine in the treatment of adolescent chronic fatigue syndrome: a pilot study for the NorCAPITAL trial
Published in
BMC Research Notes, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-5-418
Pubmed ID
Authors

Even Fagermoen, Dag Sulheim, Anette Winger, Anders M Andersen, Nils Tore Vethe, J Philip Saul, Erik Thaulow, Vegard Bruun Wyller

Abstract

This pilot study (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01507701) assessed the feasibility and safety of clonidine in adolescent chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Specifically, we assessed clonidine dosage in relation to a) plasma concentration levels, b) orthostatic cardiovascular responses, and c) possible adverse effects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 17%
Researcher 6 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Professor 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 9 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 33%
Neuroscience 3 8%
Computer Science 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 9 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2019.
All research outputs
#1,553,198
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#176
of 4,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,073
of 185,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#9
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.