↓ Skip to main content

The development of quality indicators in mental healthcare: a discrete choice experiment

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The development of quality indicators in mental healthcare: a discrete choice experiment
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-244x-12-103
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ron Schellings, Brigitte AB Essers, Alfons G Kessels, Florian Brunner, Tijmen van de Ven, Paul BM Robben

Abstract

Health care regulatory agencies perform audits or inspections to judge the quality and safety of health care. This judgment is based on the assessment of a large set of health care indicators as accepted by the profession. However, there is a lack of knowledge about the influence of these indicators and whether a smaller number would be sufficient for a quality assessment or audit procedure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 61 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 19%
Researcher 10 16%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Other 4 6%
Other 13 21%
Unknown 10 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 21%
Social Sciences 7 11%
Psychology 6 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Other 15 24%
Unknown 11 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2012.
All research outputs
#14,148,857
of 22,673,450 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#3,010
of 4,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,614
of 166,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#62
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,673,450 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,635 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.