RT @caruzycki: 3/ So that mostly answers the question, at least for short durations. But this paper (https://t.co/dIMqBgFNyk) specifically…
RT @Orla_Hegarty: Dr Conly has previously expressed concern that higher grade masks are “more costly, require fit testing, necessitate addi…
RT @caruzycki: 3/ So that mostly answers the question, at least for short durations. But this paper (https://t.co/dIMqBgFNyk) specifically…
RT @LazarusLong13: Slide 12 - 37:13 https://t.co/iqKS8tL4YW https://t.co/dCVu6IL51X - Conly- co-author. https://t.co/zcL6m7PMNW - Conly…
RT @caruzycki: 3/ So that mostly answers the question, at least for short durations. But this paper (https://t.co/dIMqBgFNyk) specifically…
RT @caruzycki: 3/ So that mostly answers the question, at least for short durations. But this paper (https://t.co/dIMqBgFNyk) specifically…
RT @IKostenas: @Redkiraz @C_Althaus @MBattegay @MonikaBuetler @quervain_de Dr. John Conly (WHO Advisor) behauptete vor 2 Tagen in einem Web…
@Redkiraz @C_Althaus @MBattegay @MonikaBuetler @quervain_de Dr. John Conly (WHO Advisor) behauptete vor 2 Tagen in einem Webinar, dass N95 Masken wegen Akne riskant seien. Hier Conly, Pittet usw. https://t.co/FdYQzh5EeH Immer noch Ignoranz gegenüber airbor
RT @Orla_Hegarty: Dr Conly has previously expressed concern that higher grade masks are “more costly, require fit testing, necessitate addi…
This is why I don’t understand mask dogmatism. Anything short of a fit tested N95 is a half measure. How does it make sense to heavily police 100% compliance with a half measure?
RT @caruzycki: 3/ So that mostly answers the question, at least for short durations. But this paper (https://t.co/dIMqBgFNyk) specifically…
RT @Orla_Hegarty: Dr Conly has previously expressed concern that higher grade masks are “more costly, require fit testing, necessitate addi…
RT @caruzycki: 3/ So that mostly answers the question, at least for short durations. But this paper (https://t.co/dIMqBgFNyk) specifically…
RT @Orla_Hegarty: Dr Conly has previously expressed concern that higher grade masks are “more costly, require fit testing, necessitate addi…
RT @Orla_Hegarty: Dr Conly has previously expressed concern that higher grade masks are “more costly, require fit testing, necessitate addi…
RT @Orla_Hegarty: Dr Conly has previously expressed concern that higher grade masks are “more costly, require fit testing, necessitate addi…
RT @caruzycki: 3/ So that mostly answers the question, at least for short durations. But this paper (https://t.co/dIMqBgFNyk) specifically…
Slide 12 - 37:13 https://t.co/iqKS8tL4YW https://t.co/dCVu6IL51X - Conly- co-author. https://t.co/zcL6m7PMNW - Conly https://t.co/wTh40xSEqL - 2nd time cited. https://t.co/LXOCcih6YB - most likely. Durante-magnoni CMI 2020- not found. https://t.co/31
RT @Orla_Hegarty: Dr Conly has previously expressed concern that higher grade masks are “more costly, require fit testing, necessitate addi…
RT @Orla_Hegarty: Dr Conly has previously expressed concern that higher grade masks are “more costly, require fit testing, necessitate addi…
RT @caruzycki: 3/ So that mostly answers the question, at least for short durations. But this paper (https://t.co/dIMqBgFNyk) specifically…
My #Grandma had this saying, which translates roughly to "Since burglars got all my good dishes, I will always be eating from broken china" Giving up on something that could save lives because it is apparently difficult to do is the above mindset.
RT @Orla_Hegarty: Dr Conly has previously expressed concern that higher grade masks are “more costly, require fit testing, necessitate addi…
Dr Conly has previously expressed concern that higher grade masks are “more costly, require fit testing, necessitate additional time & resources, do not provide an adequate fit in individuals with beards, & may provide a false sense of security” #C
RT @CPita3: This isn't an exaggeration.. just read through this 🔥🗑. Written on behalf of the WHO IPAC committee, and Dr. Conly defended th…
RT @fvguima: Aqui o artigo do Conly, publicado ano passado, defendendo que "COVID is not airborne" e que PFFs não são necessárias nem mesmo…
RT @CPita3: This isn't an exaggeration.. just read through this 🔥🗑. Written on behalf of the WHO IPAC committee, and Dr. Conly defended th…
This isn't an exaggeration.. just read through this 🔥🗑. Written on behalf of the WHO IPAC committee, and Dr. Conly defended these points today. https://t.co/0e4sFxuyDa
RT @fvguima: Aqui o artigo do Conly, publicado ano passado, defendendo que "COVID is not airborne" e que PFFs não são necessárias nem mesmo…
RT @fvguima: Aqui o artigo do Conly, publicado ano passado, defendendo que "COVID is not airborne" e que PFFs não são necessárias nem mesmo…
RT @fvguima: Aqui o artigo do Conly, publicado ano passado, defendendo que "COVID is not airborne" e que PFFs não são necessárias nem mesmo…
RT @fvguima: Aqui o artigo do Conly, publicado ano passado, defendendo que "COVID is not airborne" e que PFFs não são necessárias nem mesmo…
Aqui o artigo do Conly, publicado ano passado, defendendo que "COVID is not airborne" e que PFFs não são necessárias nem mesmo para profissionais de saúde, quanto menos para a população em geral. Eu mesmo aceitei (e promovi) esse argumento durante +1 ano.
And finally... my personal favourite 🔥 take.. https://t.co/0e4sFxuyDa
Just a reminder: Conly’s argument in https://t.co/74VtcJJq3o leans on the “there’s no evidence” post, which evidence completely demolishes. I don’t think this is going to be an actual debate, because Conly’s claim has been disproven. It should be interesti
@DFisman @HuffmanLabDU @kprather88 Conly’s paper https://t.co/74VtcJJq3o cites the WHO report *as evidence against* from Feb 2020 BUT that said aerosol transmission is an open question! (p. 36) https://t.co/xmwYKzrKfs
RT @jmcrookston: You can read this article (in all its glorious nonsense) here: https://t.co/L2L9daFoyy Note author: "on behalf of the IP…
RT @jmcrookston: You can read this article (in all its glorious nonsense) here: https://t.co/L2L9daFoyy Note author: "on behalf of the IP…
RT @jmcrookston: You can read this article (in all its glorious nonsense) here: https://t.co/L2L9daFoyy Note author: "on behalf of the IP…
RT @jmcrookston: You can read this article (in all its glorious nonsense) here: https://t.co/L2L9daFoyy Note author: "on behalf of the IP…
You can read this article (in all its glorious nonsense) here: https://t.co/L2L9daFoyy Note author: "on behalf of the IPAC R&D Expert Group for COVID-19"
RT @CPita3: @gabbystern @BertMac00600145 @WHO What can @WHO do now? Start by immediately retracting this: https://t.co/ljq7RBIZ3r
RT @DrDayaSharma: The Conly July 2020 paper reinforced the droplet dogma of Covid transmission and undermined the importance of airborne PP…
The Conly July 2020 paper reinforced the droplet dogma of Covid transmission and undermined the importance of airborne PPE. This puts health care workers at higher risk of infection. #COVIDisAirborne
@gabbystern @BertMac00600145 @WHO What can @WHO do now? Start by immediately retracting this: https://t.co/ljq7RBIZ3r
While the now infamous Mar 2020 tweet from @WHO, which stated that COVID is NOT Airborne is unfortunate, in my opinion, the more egregious error was this Conly et al paper from July 2020, which was submitted on behalf of the WHO IPAC Expert Group. 12\ htt
@kprather88 @WHO @DrMikeRyan @mvankerkhove From what I understand, @Metadoc, you were a co-author of the commentary below which dismisses airborne transmission as an important transmission pathway of SARS-CoV-2. https://t.co/V88GESm9Gd
RT @invadingpirate: "The single most important [infection control] concept identified [in SARS] ... is the precision of execution in the us…
RT @invadingpirate: "The single most important [infection control] concept identified [in SARS] ... is the precision of execution in the us…
"The single most important [infection control] concept identified [in SARS] ... is the precision of execution in the use of PPE ... rather than the type of mask." https://t.co/QSMYpULpG2
RT @CPita3: @SaskiaPopescu @WHO This was the position in July 2020, I'm hoping the WHO IPAC team's position on respirators has since evolve…
@SaskiaPopescu @WHO This was the position in July 2020, I'm hoping the WHO IPAC team's position on respirators has since evolved with the evolving evidence on Aerosol transmission? https://t.co/0e4sFxuyDa
@JOHNJOHNSTONED @WHO Should we take anything from the fact Seto was involved in the WHO Ventilation document, but Conly wasn't? @trishgreenhalgh pointed out the WHO IPAC team is a different body. Conly and Seto previously teamed up for this poorly aging pi
RT @ChrisLancashir3: Can you scientifically proof #SARSCoV2 is not transmitted by #airborne @CollignonPeter ? Interesting twitter debate 7…
Can you scientifically proof #SARSCoV2 is not transmitted by #airborne @CollignonPeter ? Interesting twitter debate 7th Aug 2020 with Professor Jimenez @jljcolorado Aerosol Scientist #COVIDisAirborne 😷
RT @Metadoc: Being reported that Mayor of London wants people to wear FFP2 masks on transport. We reviewed these for World Health Org. They…
4. Were patients infectious at the time the data was collected? Eg We may have falsely concluded droplet precautions were adequate to prevent transmission in ICU HCWs looking after a patient that potentially may have been in their post-infectious period.
RT @Metadoc: Being reported that Mayor of London wants people to wear FFP2 masks on transport. We reviewed these for World Health Org. They…
Being reported that Mayor of London wants people to wear FFP2 masks on transport. We reviewed these for World Health Org. They provide little benefit over medical masks in most settings and can be harmful https://t.co/mbNmq9z9M4 @MayorofLondon #COVID19 #C
@al_antdp https://t.co/NMwhmiQhlv Este fala do uso de máscaras vs respiradores.
@DRTomlinsonEP @WHO Read this useless piece of trash next: https://t.co/L2L9daFoyy
Teachers, the latest strain possibly 70% MORE infectious, bc our classrms make social dist impossible, and bc covid is in the air, please immediately invest in medical masks for yourselves. They are forcing us back in regardless of community spread. Try to
@AntibioticDoc Good afternoon, Dr. Saxinger. I suspect that you have heard of Dr. Raina McIntyre ( https://t.co/0ibaMmNoiW ). She co-authored an excellent Letter to the Editor regarding Conly's work on respirators versus masks (https://t.co/zcL6m7PMNW)
@YouAreLobbyLud @Globalbiosec @rajah_mich @kate_cole_ @drajm @jmcrookston this is the article referred to in the screenshot email from Conly https://t.co/G85JnwqJUc
RT @jljcolorado: And for the record, I view the "continuum" argument as flawed. Yes, there is some transition in properties vs. size, but <…
RT @jljcolorado: 6/ Y los miembros de Comité IPC de la OMS @WHO, que decidieron que los aerosoles eran un bulo (en marzo) y que son poco im…
@drvyom @NSWCEC @acemonline @WHO Watch this... https://t.co/euFFel9dkp https://t.co/tVu4Dv8q2W
RT @jljcolorado: 6/ Y los miembros de Comité IPC de la OMS @WHO, que decidieron que los aerosoles eran un bulo (en marzo) y que son poco im…
RT @jljcolorado: 6/ Y los miembros de Comité IPC de la OMS @WHO, que decidieron que los aerosoles eran un bulo (en marzo) y que son poco im…
RT @jljcolorado: 6/ Y los miembros de Comité IPC de la OMS @WHO, que decidieron que los aerosoles eran un bulo (en marzo) y que son poco im…
6/ Y los miembros de Comité IPC de la OMS @WHO, que decidieron que los aerosoles eran un bulo (en marzo) y que son poco importantes (Julio hasta ahora). En su artículo: https://t.co/ZjYlC7atyE https://t.co/LqwqIiHZUp
Not latest news but coming from asia where sars cov 2 infection rates are low! https://t.co/nRs5kHwGtk
RT @mdjkf: Important review: " ... data supporting that airborne transmission is not a predominant mode of transmission and therefore that…
This was one influential review on the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 that included this particular example from the Singapore intensive care unit. https://t.co/xockRyCsBT https://t.co/EzpgfSJI1G
@snouzin @AMA_WAPresident @ASA_Australia @evidenceCOVID19 @ANZCA @AliciaTDennis @drajm @djsPerth @maffygirl @patientsafe3 @jhjelliott @VBeavis Hopefully co-chair and longstanding aerosol denier @mdjkf, has learnt more about transmission and HCW protection
RT @CollignonPeter: SARS-CoV-2 is not spread by the airborne route to any significant extent and the use of particulate respirators offer…
RT @CollignonPeter: Currently available evidence supports that the predominant route of human-to-human transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 is th…
RT @CollignonPeter: Currently available evidence supports that the predominant route of human-to-human transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 is th…
RT @CollignonPeter: Currently available evidence supports that the predominant route of human-to-human transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 is th…
@drvyom Said it all in there. It's too hard and people can't use it properly. So we are not going to even try to teach them. The medical worker equivalent of 'let it rip'. https://t.co/ak8ibhDUGu
@AndrewHewat @busycactus @rajah_mich The language that @CollignonPeter uses is usually "predominant transmission is droplet". Not sure if he reads anything that contradicts his priors on this... https://t.co/mwZt9k3ehM
RT @BarryHunt008: Well this WHO boys club ‘study’ did not age well: “droplet and fomite transmission” “< 5-10 μm” “do not support significa…
RT @BarryHunt008: Well this WHO boys club ‘study’ did not age well: “droplet and fomite transmission” “< 5-10 μm” “do not support significa…
Well this WHO boys club ‘study’ did not age well: “droplet and fomite transmission” “< 5-10 μm” “do not support significant airborne transmission” “hospitals in Calgary, Canada...with no nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 transmission events documented in any HCWs”
@ianmSC Lol Maybe because it is spread by droplets and fomite and kaka. https://t.co/bZcMWJI2v7
https://t.co/bZcMWJqrDz @MartinKulldorff Question for Dr K: Given the conclusion of this paper that Cov2 isn't airborne, what benefits do face coverings provide vs. covering the face when one coughs/sneezes? What risks do uneducated use of ppe present?
RT @jljcolorado: 35/ However, 5 um error is widely adopted and repeated in many papers and guidance from CDC and WHO for decades. For exa…
RT @jljcolorado: 32/ Our message about 5 um error has been heard. So the new way to deal with it seems to be to say something like: “It i…
RT @jljcolorado: 35/ However, 5 um error is widely adopted and repeated in many papers and guidance from CDC and WHO for decades. For exa…
RT @jljcolorado: 35/ However, 5 um error is widely adopted and repeated in many papers and guidance from CDC and WHO for decades. For exa…