↓ Skip to main content

A randomized controlled trial comparing the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) and integrated EMDR-Dialectical Behavioural Therapy (DBT…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
224 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A randomized controlled trial comparing the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) and integrated EMDR-Dialectical Behavioural Therapy (DBT) in the treatment of patients with post-traumatic stress disorder and comorbid (Sub)clinical borderline personality disorder: study design
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, August 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12888-020-02713-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aishah Snoek, Aartjan T. F. Beekman, Jack Dekker, Inga Aarts, Gerard van Grootheest, Matthijs Blankers, Chris Vriend, Odile van den Heuvel, Kathleen Thomaes

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 224 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 15%
Student > Bachelor 24 11%
Researcher 12 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 5%
Unspecified 12 5%
Other 35 16%
Unknown 96 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 60 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 9%
Unspecified 12 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 4%
Neuroscience 8 4%
Other 15 7%
Unknown 100 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2020.
All research outputs
#18,739,545
of 23,228,787 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#3,987
of 4,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#300,893
of 398,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#91
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,228,787 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.