↓ Skip to main content

Seventh BMC ecology image competition: the winning images

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 417)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
twitter
80 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Seventh BMC ecology image competition: the winning images
Published in
BMC Ecology, August 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12898-020-00310-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alison L. Cuff, Michel Baguette, Simon Blanchet, Luke M. Jacobus, Dominique Mazzi, Josef Settele

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 80 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 1 50%
Student > Master 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 50%
Computer Science 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 140. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2021.
All research outputs
#189,026
of 19,214,062 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology
#5
of 417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,893
of 307,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,214,062 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 417 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,333 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them