| Title |
International variation in the management of severe COVID-19 patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-03194-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elie Azoulay, Jan de Waele, Ricard Ferrer, Thomas Staudinger, Marta Borkowska, Pedro Povoa, Katerina Iliopoulou, Antonio Artigas, Stefan J. Schaller, Manu Shankar-Hari, Mariangela Pellegrini, Michael Darmon, Jozef Kesecioglu, Maurizio Cecconi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 96 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 11% |
| Italy | 6 | 6% |
| Mexico | 5 | 5% |
| India | 4 | 4% |
| Spain | 3 | 3% |
| France | 3 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 3 | 3% |
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| Belgium | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 21% |
| Unknown | 35 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 65 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 15% |
| Scientists | 13 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 128 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 13% |
| Researcher | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 28 | 22% |
| Unknown | 38 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 46 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2023.
All research outputs
#807,636
of 25,872,466 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#578
of 6,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,425
of 428,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#27
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,872,466 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.