You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
What do people benefit from a citizen science programme? Evidence from a Rwandan citizen science programme on malaria control
|
---|---|
Published in |
Malaria Journal, August 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12936-020-03349-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Domina Asingizwe, P. Marijn Poortvliet, Arnold J. H. van Vliet, Constantianus J. M. Koenraadt, Chantal M. Ingabire, Leon Mutesa, Cees Leeuwis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Austria | 2 | 15% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
Rwanda | 1 | 8% |
United States | 1 | 8% |
Chile | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 7 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 69% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 15% |
Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 17% |
Student > Master | 9 | 14% |
Researcher | 6 | 9% |
Lecturer | 5 | 8% |
Librarian | 3 | 5% |
Other | 12 | 18% |
Unknown | 19 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 12% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 9% |
Environmental Science | 6 | 9% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 6% |
Other | 14 | 22% |
Unknown | 23 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,769,326
of 24,510,033 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#306
of 5,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,507
of 403,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#14
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,510,033 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.