↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of different storage times and preservation methods on phlebotomine sand fly DNA concentration and purity

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of different storage times and preservation methods on phlebotomine sand fly DNA concentration and purity
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, August 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13071-020-04270-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kamila Gaudêncio da Silva Sales, Débora Elienai de Oliveira Miranda, Fernando José da Silva, Domenico Otranto, Luciana Aguiar Figueredo, Filipe Dantas-Torres

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Other 1 6%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 5 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 17%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 6 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2020.
All research outputs
#14,208,145
of 23,228,787 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#2,686
of 5,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,461
of 398,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#71
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,228,787 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.