↓ Skip to main content

Phenotypic techniques and applications in fruit trees: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Phenotypic techniques and applications in fruit trees: a review
Published in
Plant Methods, August 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13007-020-00649-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yirui Huang, Zhenhui Ren, Dongming Li, Xuan Liu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 13 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 37%
Engineering 7 13%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 16 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2021.
All research outputs
#11,381,989
of 20,582,425 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#494
of 972 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,590
of 311,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,582,425 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 972 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them